Chicago, IL vs Fort Worth, TX

Housing Costs and Affordability

A common benchmark is spending no more than 30% of gross income on housing. In Chicago, IL, renters allocate roughly 22.0% of median household income to rent (within that threshold). In Fort Worth, TX, the figure is 22.1% , making Chicago, IL the easier city for renters on a budget.

For prospective homebuyers, the price-to-income ratio tells you how many years of gross income it takes to match the median home price. In Chicago, IL, that ratio is 4.2x. Homes cost 4.2 times the median annual income. In Fort Worth, TX, it's 3.6x. Homeownership is relatively more accessible in Fort Worth, TX.

Monthly housing costs (rent plus utilities) average $1,502 in Chicago and $1,489 in Fort Worth. These figures include renters paying utilities separately from rent.

Income and Labor Market

Median household income in Chicago, IL is $75,134; in Fort Worth, TX it is $76,602. That's a $1,468 gap, but income alone doesn't tell the full story without accounting for local costs.

Unemployment stands at 7.9% in Chicago and 4.9% in Fort Worth. Labor force participation (the share of the population working or actively job-seeking) is 55.5% in Chicago versus 52.3% in Fort Worth.

Population

Chicago, IL has a population of 2,707,648, making it the larger of the two cities. Fort Worth, TX has 941,311 residents. City size affects everything from transit options and job market depth to cost pressures. Larger metros typically see higher housing demand.